send "subCheckNow" to me, or?

[Mark Smith]

The 2nd won't work, I'm pretty sure. I've used the 1st (usually send  
"subCheck" to me in n seconds)  without problem.

best,

Mark

On 7 Jul 2006, at 09:37, Garrett Hylltun wrote

> Rev 2.6.1 / OS X
>
> Greetings,
>
> Is it better to use "send" or just use the name of the handler?
>
> on subCheckNow
>   -- do stuff here
>   send "subCheckNow" to me
> end subCheckNow
>
> Or this?
>
> on subCheckNow
>   -- do stuff here
>   subCheckNow
> end subCheckNow
>
>
> Is the second even allowed? And, if it is allowed, is their any ill  
> effects from doing this?
>
>
> Thanks,
> -Garrett
> _______________________________________________
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your  
> subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution