Printing problem on Windows machine
Timothy Miller
gandalf at doctortimothyMiller.com
Wed Jan 11 17:36:56 EST 2006
It's me, the OP on this thread.
A wise and generous soul has sent me a private message, including a
model script necessary to print fields more than one printed page
long, on a Windows machine. I'd suppose this has been discussed to
death, so I'll let it rest.
I wonder if this is a sign from the Supreme Geek -- a stern warning
of greater suffering to come if I continue to spurn my Macintosh.
Thanks to the list for being there when I need you.
Tim
>Greetings,
>
>I never imagined I'd stop using my trusty Macintosh. However, I'm
>trying the stacks I use to run my business on a Windows XP machine,
>at least temporarily. Except for minor adjustments of button types,
>text margins and such, it seemed to work fine, until today.
>
>The problem command is not exactly unusual:
>
>revPrintField (the name of bg field "text")
>
>This would normally produce two or three pages of printer output.
>It's worked perfectly on thousands of occasions on my Macintosh.
>
>On the XP machine there is something terribly wrong with the printed
>output. Oddly, the first page prints just dandy. On subsequent
>pages, two or three characters, even more, get printed on top of
>each other. This mostly happens on the right hand side of each line,
>though that is not consistent.
>
>I tried setting the formatforPrinting property of the stack to true.
>No help. I know I'm following the proper procedure (rather
>cumbersome, it seems) for setting that property, because the little
>script I wrote reports the value of the property with an "answer"
>dialog box.
>
>I tried setting the printmargins to a reasonable value -- a value
>that works fine on the Windows machine on another stack, where I
>print a card, not a field. No help. As far as I can tell, the
>printmargins apply only to printing cards, anyway -- not fields.
>
>So, I'm out of ideas. Any suggestions would be appreciated. If this
>issue has been discussed endlessly, a helpful link would probably be
>sufficient.
>
>Cheers,
>
>Tim Miller
>_______________________________________________
>use-revolution mailing list
>use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
>Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
>subscription preferences:
>http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
More information about the use-livecode
mailing list