Transcript and Dot Notation

[Jim Ault]

On 2/27/06 6:53 AM, "Thomas McGrath III" <3mcgrath at adelphia.net> wrote:

> 01010011 01101111 01110010 01110100 01101001 01101110 01100111
> 00100000 01110100 01101000 01110010 01101111 01110101 01100111
> 01101000 00100000 01101100 01101001 01101110 01100101 01110011
> 00100000 01101111 01100110 00100000 01100010 01101001 01101110
> 01100001 01110010 01111001 00100000 01101001 01110011 00100000
> 01110011 01100101 01111000 01111001 00100000 01100010 01110101
> 01110100 00100000 01101110 01101111 01110100 00100000 01110110
> 01100101 01110010 01111001 00100000 01110000 01110010 01101111
> 01100100 01110101 01100011 01110100 01101001 01110110 01100101 00101110
> 

I agree with all but your second point about formatting.

Jim Ault
Las Vegas

> On Feb 27, 2006, at 2:54 AM, Scott Kane wrote:
> 
>>> in octal on the face of the ``computer'' to initialise the ``boot-
>>> loader'' so that the machine could get started.
>> 
>> Sometimes I miss converting hex and oct into decimal.
>> I started my professional career (as opposed to my teenage
>> programming) programming Data Checker DTS cash registers.
>> The "zero report" and comparing it to other master machines
>> for the location of corruption (a common event in memory at
>> that time) was so eloquent.  <g>
>>