On the Democratic Operation of Bugzilla
Garrett Hylltun
garrett at paraboliclogic.com
Thu Feb 23 15:13:20 EST 2006
On Feb 23, 2006, at 11:07 AM, Dan Shafer wrote:
> This provided me with an opportunity to say something I've been
> meaning to say for some time but never had a "trigger" for.
Ditto!
Ok, so I spent all this money for Rev, and I would expect that any
bug report sent to them would be taken seriously and that it would be
actively followed up by the company. I can understand setting
priorities depending on the severity of the bug, but having the users
rate and vote? I thought I was purchasing a product, not getting
married to a second wife! Bugzilla seems like it relies far too much
on the users and not enough on the company. Users should not have to
do such things, especially after spending this much money on the
product. It's almost absurd, more so if just because a bug is not
rated hight or voted on by anyone else, then is that to say that it
may get completely ignored?
So it seems this is the scenario; Pay hefty price for Rev, pay hefty
price for updates?!/upgrades, Pay heavy for extras, and make the
users who paid for the product work for you by making them search out
all the bugs, post them for you, rate them for you, vote on them for
you, follow up on them for you..... To quote "Jubel Early", a not so
famous bounty hunter from a not so famous TV series that's long since
been canceled... "Does that seem right to you?"
I can understand the hefty base price of the product, I can't agree
with having to pay for damned updates! where fixes that they should
be responsible for should be taken care of by them. I can understand
a small fee for upgrades, but not the amount they are asking for.
But what upsets me the most is depending on the paying customers to
help them track down bugs! What the hell are they doing with the
money? And what the hell are they doing releasing a product that is
already known to have bugs still in it! They should be paying
testers for this and not raping the paying customers for this work.
With the prices they are charging for everything, we shouldn't even
be having this conversation at all! If a user finds a bug, he/she
should be able to simply report the bug to Rev either via email or a
bug report form on their site, and they should take care of
everything from there! That bug should be gone by the next update of
the product.
I'm sorry for being a bit over the edge, but I've been in this
business myself, and this really makes me mad. You don't release
products if you know it still contains bugs! You don't upgrade your
product unless the upgrade fixes all the prior bugs. Updates are to
fix bugs and issues that you didn't catch earlier, that somehow got
past your beta testing team, and updates are free since you're fixing
your own mistakes, not mistakes of the customer. Upgrades are not
like going from 1.1 to 1.2, but from 1.x to 2.x Upgrades are when
the product has had some major changes done to it, improvements and
new features over the previous version.
I'm really starting to regret my purchasing Rev now. I'm feeling
like I've been ripped off. Rev is a nice product, but if this is how
the company is going to operate, then I'm not going to be updating/
upgrading. And I doubt that Rev is going to change their business
practice since it seems so many people tolerate it and continue to
give them money for releasing a product that will always have bugs in
it.
Runtime... Stop charging for updates! Fix all the bugs and release
an update, then work on an upgrade when all the bugs are fixed. Go
ahead and charge for upgrades. Dump the 'zilla stuff and setup your
own internal bug tracking system so you guys can take care of this
and leave the customers out of the process. Beat the crap out of
your beta testing team for allowing all this stuff to get through to
the customers.
Sorry to everyone else for my angry post to the mailing list. If a
hand slapping is due to me for this, I'll gladly take it as I should.
Best regards,
-Garrett
More information about the use-livecode
mailing list