Pointlessness [was Revolution RUMORS!]

David Vaughan dvk at dvkconsult.com.au
Wed Feb 15 17:35:37 EST 2006


On 16/02/2006, at 5:00, David Burgun <dburgun at dsl.pipex.com> wrote:
<snip>
> Yes, in order to stop other people getting into the same position.
> Once the cat was out of the bag there was no need for anyone to go to
> the site again. It could be argued that he should be praised for his
> selfless actions and RunRev chastised for their unsafe site!

David, I have full regard for the value of your posts on other topics  
but what you have above is about the most specious argument for  
anything that I have ever seen on this site.

Your later paragraphs, about the list to which the material might  
have been posted and possible consequences thereof, are pure  
sophistry.  Runtime owns this particular list and may include or  
exclude any person on their own cognizance and in their own  
commercial interests. Over many years, I have found them to walk a  
pretty good line, with tolerance, humour and only the occasional fit  
of pique :-).
>
Should we infer from your last line that you like to have the last  
word? I promise not to write on the topic again, so here you go:
> Would have been ended!



More information about the use-livecode mailing list