converting a standalone back to a stack?

[Phil Davis]

Apparently stacks are separated from the engine and from each other 
(when there are substacks) by a certain string of chars. Something 
appeared on the list ages ago about this - I can't look for it right 
now. I think someone posted code to extract the stacks.

Phil Davis


kee nethery wrote:
> Is this possible? What I want to do is to capture some code that I  
> thought I'd never need again that only exists in a standalone. Other  
> than opening the standalone contents with a text editor and searching  
> for the script, is there a way to just convert the standalone back to  a 
> stack?
> 
> Thanks, Kee Nethery