Revolution RUMORS!

[Judy Perry]

I would agree, however, RunRev clearly didn't want this information
available now.  Sure, they may have forgotten to 'lock the door', but
that's not a good excuse to go inside anyway.

And, so, Richmond had to know that he was "scooping" after snooping.  Did
he think that the company would thank him for this?  Unless you can
answer "yes" with a straight face, it's difficult to identify a rationale
that justifies the behavior.

And, of course, I say this as someone who has spent waaayyyy too much time
on the naughty seat myself.

Judy

On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Mark Wieder wrote:
> I reluctantly have to agree with Richard on this. There's enough blame
> and enough finger-pointing to go around, but in general it's bad form
> to take down a web site for a few days with nothing but a 404 page
> that says "come back in a few hours" and put up half-contructed new
> pages that replace the ones that were previously there. Normally the
> new content is constructed and the switch-over isn't done until it's
> ready to go.