Runtime Revolution Ships Revolution Media

[Robert Brenstein]

>  > Why introduce confusion and exacerbate a perception of
>>  flightiness only to assist a branding effort which accounts
>>  for a scenario that never happened?
>>
>>  It may be the case that Adobe, Macromedia, Netscape, Apple,
>>  Asymetrix, and other companies with strong market research
>>  departments are not entirely wrong on this.
>
>If you'd like to send me the case studies used internally at these companies
>to support your argument, it would go a long way in convincing one way or
>the other.
>

As I said earlier, I don't see the change so significant really in 
either direction. I presume this was discussed heavily and the 
decision was not made lightly, although there are pros and cons for 
either. The only thing that makes me somewhat uncomfortable, on the 
second thought, is calling a programming language "revolution". Kinda 
odd, considering that it is a common word. May be a compromise could 
be to retain the name but don't call it be name in the marketing 
materials, simply referring to the scripting language OF Revolution. 
I find this more clear than "English-like Revolution is the easiest
scripting language available".

Robert