Revdocs on a wiki

[Dennis Brown]

By the same token, having a link to the wiki from the built-in docs,  
would obviate the need to duplicate the same info in the wiki.  Only  
the additional information need be in the wiki.

However, if the internal docs could download a corrected definition  
from the wiki, then there is a good reason to have the complete  
definition included.  Could bring up the possibility of an auto  
update/notification:

Message:  There is an updated definition for "isNumber".  Would you  
like to download it now?  Yes No View


Dennis

On Oct 27, 2005, at 2:51 PM, Troy Rollins wrote:

>
> On Oct 27, 2005, at 2:23 PM, Mark Swindell wrote:
>
>
>> Using the existing docs as a starting point would be optimal, in  
>> my view.
>>
>
> Exactly, otherwise there will be a wiki with many blank or  
> placeholder pages which cannot completely support the user's  
> inquiries - which ultimately results in a tool which is not used.
>
> It would also be best if each page in the official documentation  
> could link directly to the wiki page for the same term or item. If  
> you can't easily get to the information from within the Rev  
> environment there will be far less users of the system.
> --
> Troy
> RPSystems, Ltd.
> http://www.rpsystems.net
>
> _______________________________________________
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your  
> subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
>