FORTH

[MisterX]

that's possible! but forth wasn't in mind though I did try long ago
a forth language on my first mac named Neon... If anyone remembers it!

cheers
Xavier 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: use-revolution-bounces at lists.runrev.com 
> [mailto:use-revolution-bounces at lists.runrev.com] On Behalf Of 
> Mark Wieder
> Sent: Monday, October 17, 2005 1:01 AM
> To: How to use Revolution
> Subject: FORTH
> 
> Dennis-
> 
> Sunday, October 16, 2005, 9:58:04 AM, you wrote:
> 
> > to Forth.  Forth is a low level but extensible language and IDE from
> 
> Forth? (Running over to x's web site to check it out...) 
> Forth is as close to the metal as you can get without writing 
> in ones and zeros.
> 
> > One of the weaknesses of XTalk/Transcript in my opinion was 
> that you 
> > could not directly and efficiently extend the language in 
> this same way.
> 
> XTalk would be more on the path to Forthness if we could 
> overload keywords and add new ones. Of course, that would 
> probably also require namespaces and an include mechanism. 
> Imagine patching "trunc" so that it does the right thing by:
> 
> function trunc pValue
>   return trunc(pValue & "")
> end trunc
> 
> --
> -Mark Wieder
>  mwieder at ahsoftware.net
> 
> _______________________________________________
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage 
> your subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution