deleteDups()

[Geoff Canyon]

On Nov 16, 2005, at 9:44 AM, Alex Tweedly wrote:

> Geoff Canyon wrote:
>
>>
>> Bother -- it happened again. First we had repeat for each turning  
>> up  faster than the filter command. Now I've done a test on the   
>> following, and it looks like the split command takes not quite  
>> twice  as long as repeat for each (when repeat for each is handled  
>> the  following way).
>>
> I wonder if this is because the "split" method used a secondary  
> delimiter (numtochar(3)) which doesn't exist in the data. (Nothing  
> to do with the choice of secondaryDelimiter - you need to pick one  
> that isn't in the data).

That's what I suspect.