is there a best anti-viral program for Revolution?

[Dar Scott]

On May 25, 2005, at 12:05 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
>>> Looking at RevOnline it appears that the concept of "trusted" sites 
>>> has already been implemented -- is it not documented?
>>
>> Where are you looking?
>
> The v2.5 docs describe a host of security and encryption options, 
> including secure sockets, and watching messages shows calls named 
> rvoSecureStatus, rvoSecureCancel, and ulIsSecure.
>
> Not sure what they do, but since Rev is aware of security concerns and 
> RevOnline premiered when secure sockets premiered it would seem 
> reasonable that they use secure sockets to validate channels.

It would be nice to have a statement on the RevOnline security--its 
capabilities and what it does not do.

Suppose I trust Richard Gaskin (reasonable, I think), is there a way to 
translate that to being comfortable in downloading a particular stack 
from Revolution Online?

Dar