cRev calls; was Re: Table Field Docs?

[Stephen Barncard]

... and furthermore, I've never poked around in the IDE and support stacks.
I would imagine all those cRevtable calls are there for the 
spelunking....and the curious. I see those messages in the watcher.


sqb

At 10:29 PM +0200 5/10/05, jbv wrote:
>I do agree with Stephen.
>Table fields can be used in professional applications, and Rev
>is rich & flexible enough to provide simple workarounds for
>each undocumented or "unfinished" feature...
>JB
>
>>  I don't know if would be correct to call it flaky as much as
>>  undocumented. It might work incredibly well. It might work perfectly
>  > if we knew how to do it right. So I'll wait for Eric's demo stack.
>>
>