Documentation Errors [Was: naming variables...]

[Dennis Brown]

[I am resending this message, because it seems to have been lost in  
the mail]

Brian,

This brings up a good point that has been bugging me for years.  It  
is ABSOLUTELY RIDICULOUS that the Rev documentation built in to the  
IDE is so full of errors.  How many repeat questions and confusion by  
folks trying to learn Rev are the result of wrong or missing  
documentation.  Don't get me wrong, I really like the built in Doc.   
It is just that even I can read through it and find error after  
error.  It seems like it would be so easy for an informed Rev  
programmer at RunRev to step through and fix up the doc in a matter  
of a week or two.  It takes ten times as much work to make BZ reports  
about the errors than it does to just fix them.  I bet a Wiki style  
doc file that the users could input to and that could be downloaded  
to the IDE if desired could cure the problem.  It would probably  
greatly expand the "How Do I"  and simple examples also.  It seems  
like lots of people have tried to improve on the docs in various  
places on the web, but I don't want to go searching through ten sites  
and discussion lists to find a bit of info that should be part of the  
built-in docs.

Stupid Doc errors AND small bugs in the IDE that are ignored (because  
GOOD programmers can find an undocumented workaround) make a bad  
impression about the quality of Revolution.  It is even more damaging  
to DreamCard which is aimed at a less sophisticated users.  As users  
we can't do much about the programming problems, except complain.   
However, if RunRev would empower us, we could do great stuff about  
the docs.  Just from being on this list for a few weeks, I can see  
the quality of the user community and know that it could work -- 
especially if it were sponsored and monitored by RunRev.

Go ahead, make my day... tell me it is already in the works  ;-)

Dennis

On May 6, 2005, at 12:31 AM, Brian Yennie wrote:


>> It is not a scripting error if you are following the Reference  
>> Documentation supplied with Rev:
>>
>>
>
> Right... I meant it was an "obvious scripting error" by the folks  
> at RunRev in their documentation, not that it was an obvious error  
> by you who was just following the docs =)!
>
> - Brian
>
> _______________________________________________
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
>
>