Unicode

[Thomas McGrath III]

Klaus,

Of course there is none.

When I saw your response I was heading out the door to get the dogs in 
and only saw the first unicodetext. I thought "Yeah I tried that." but 
really had not. You know, when you find yourself adding a little 
frustration when figuring something out it never helps and ends up 
making you miss things. Also, the reason I noticed it right away in the 
stack was the script editor had both unicodetext's in blazing red.
I have always wanted the emails to keep the coloring of copied scripts 
and typed ones too.

Thank you though for the answer to my problem,

Tom

On May 6, 2005, at 5:00 AM, Klaus Major wrote:

> Hi Thomas,
>
>> Thank you so much,
>>
>> Within 1 minute of downloading your helpful stack file I figured out 
>> how to do it.
>> Double unicodetext was needed at both ends to make it work.
>>
>>  set the unicodetext of field "Messages" of card "Messages" of /
>> stack "Editor" to the unicodetext of field gChangeMessages
>
> just curious, but what is the difference (except in the names of the 
> fields) to my proposal:
>
> set the unicodetext of fld "the empty one" to the unicodetext of field 
> "the one with mixed text in it"
>
> ??? :-)
>
>> It now looks and seems to work great.
>>
>> Tom
>
> Regards
>
> Klaus Major
> klaus at major-k.de
> http://www.major-k.de
>
> _______________________________________________
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
>
>

Thomas J. McGrath III
SCS
1000 Killarney Dr.
Pittsburgh, PA 15234
412-885-8541