throw vs the result

[Jan Schenkel]

--- Dar Scott <dsc at swcp.com> wrote:
> 
> On May 1, 2005, at 3:40 PM, Jan Schenkel wrote:
> 
> > Ah yes, but then I have to check the result myself
> to
> > throw an error, and that's what I wanted to avoid
> ;-)
> > My earlier suggestion is backwards-compatible but
> > allows people who like try-throw-catch, to
> structure
> > their code in a more readable way.
> 
> But your suggestion requires an enhancement (or
> maybe some fancy 
> errorDialog technique).
> 
> I was wondering about what developers can use now.
> 
> Would a property or command for each library to
> switch between 
> thrown/result help?
> 
> Dar
> 

In that case, this might be an issue for the
revInterop workgroup -- they're working on
standardizing library names and calls, and storing
information about the supported commands, functions,
properties, etc.
If you're not a member yet, I'm sure they'd like you
to join the dicsussion at:
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/revinterop/>

Jan Schenkel.

Quartam - Tools for Revolution
<http://www.quartam.com>

=====
"As we grow older, we grow both wiser and more foolish at the same time."  (La Rochefoucauld)

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com