compileIt for revolution?

[Thomas McGrath III]

Dan,

That's what I got from the first post, exactly. I tend to agree with 
your statement and your logic is sound. (not that you need me to say 
so)

I just wanted to agree to this and don't want to see Rev changed in 
another direction.

Thanks

Tom


On Jun 23, 2005, at 8:20 PM, Dan Shafer wrote:

>
> My argument is NOT against the ability to build externals to do 
> whatever one wishes to do, including platform-specific things if you 
> want to make your life more complicated and miserable or if you only 
> have to deliver a product to users of a single platform. My argument 
> is against Rev modifying the engine/tool to accommodate 
> platform-specific features in a way that causes the code of those of 
> us who don't want to use such features to break when it runs on other 
> platforms or to jump through a bunch of conditional hoops all the time 
> to get code to run on other platforms to accommodate single-platform 
> features.

Thomas J McGrath III
3mcgrath at adelphia.net

412-831-3094
220 Drake Road
Bethel Park, PA 15102

<*)) >=<
"Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of 
arriving safely in an attractive and well preserved body, but rather to 
skid in sideways - a Cigar in one hand - a large steak in the other - 
your body thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and screaming - WOO 
HOO! What a Ride!"