Dreamcard Roadster in the future???

[Brian Yennie]

Simply put, the majority of Revolution projects use features that don't 
exist in Flash. Not to mention that moving from a card metaphor to a 
frame metaphor barely even registers...

I think it's a noble idea, but the two environments are hardly similar 
at all...

> Troy Rollins <troy at rpsystems.net> writes:
>>
>> On Jun 5, 2005, at 2:44 PM, Marty Billingsley wrote:
>>
>>> I know a lot of people disagree, but Flash isn't going away anytime
>>> soon, and just about everyone has the shockwave plugin installed.
>>> What's wrong with jumping on that bandwagon?
>>
>> The two programs are so dissimilar that I can't even imagine where the
>> concept is coming from.
>
> How do you mean dissimilar?  The interface is certainly dissimilar,
> but the end product can be identical.  Why can't RR offer an
> option for saving standalone apps as OS X, Win, Unix or SWF?
> (yes, I know swf isn't a "standalone", but it's a separate document
> that plays in the browser.)
>
> Now, I don't get into the intricacies of RunRev -- I don't use
> sockets with it, or any internet protocol stuff -- but for what
> we do in my class, being able to save as a shockwave (flash) file
> would be fantastic.
>
>   - marty
>
> --
> Marty Billingsley (marty at ucls.uchicago.edu)
> The University of Chicago Laboratory Schools
> _______________________________________________
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
>
>