Revolution compilation

[Alex Tweedly]

Dar Scott wrote:

> On Jan 3, 2005, at 3:34 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
>
>> Dar Scott wrote:
>>
>>> Those and other optimizations might do more optimizing than 
>>> compiling.  Scott Raney reported a 1000 fold performance increase in 
>>> the enhancement of bugzilla 586 (which might have some nice side 
>>> effect features).
>>
>>
>> Dude, that rocks!  Thanks for submitting that request, and for 
>> letting us know the ultra-cool result.
>
>
> Before that many methods had to be limited to or emphasize appending 
> to avoid the heavy speed cost.  Appending small amounts is efficient 
> because Revolution seems to leave a tiny extra room to allow for it.
>
> This optimization for replacing same-size char chunks opens the door 
> for alternate methods that can make image processing much faster or 
> easier to understand.

I could use some help in reading (or interpreting) Bugzilla. BZ  says 
#586 is fixed (comment and "bug activity" in BZ last June) - but I can't 
see anywhere that it says when it's fixed, what version the fix got 
rolled into, or anything like that.

So 2 questions
1. Is this fix already in 2.5 ?
2. Where in BZ do you look for that info ?

Thanks
-- Alex.


-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.298 / Virus Database: 265.6.7 - Release Date: 30/12/2004