Conference Stacks (was menu maven)

[J. Landman Gay]

simplsol at aol.com wrote:
> Jacque,
> You wrote:
>  "Since I kind of doubt that people are using the "Notes" card at the 
> end, I was thinking of putting additions in there. Of course, then folks 
> have to remember to go look there. But it seems like a logical place to 
> put it, and the card already exists."
> 
>  I agree. Another benefit of eliminating the Notes card, as we know it 
> now, is people will not be randomly changing the stacks. There will be 
> one "official" stack on the Rev server which will always have the latest 
> info - this will encourage browsing rather than downloading. Everything 
> will be in sync.

Theoretically it's supposed to be like that now. Originally the Notes 
card was just for the user's personal copy, so unless someone is 
distributing theirs privately I don't think there will be much conflict. 
The "official" stack is the one on the server.

> 
>  I also think it is important to have a "gate-keeper". Someone should 
> review, filter, and possibly consolidate, the additions. I believe the 
> best person to do this is the conference author.

That would be helpful. They could send me the additions in an email and 
I could add them to the "official" copy on the server.

> Paul Looney
>  PS I hope you don't have to refer to that framed "for bad days" 
> compliment too often.

Me too! :)

-- 
Jacqueline Landman Gay         |     jacque at hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software           |     http://www.hyperactivesw.com