New project

[Dan Shafer]

Mark...

Thanks for the correction. I was oversimplifying in the interest of  
brevity. Your response is welcome.

dan

On Aug 12, 2005, at 6:14 AM, Mark Waddingham wrote:

> Just a factual correction: I neither said there would be a prototype-
> based object model, nor did I say there would be dot syntax.
>
> What I did say was that: 'the current idea of objects in Revolution is
> more akin to prototypes than classes' and 'dot-notation was
> exceptionally good at naming things (in a namespace)'.
>
>
>> From these two things I then continued to suggest that:
>>
>   1) it would make most sense for Revolution to go down the prototype-
> based path (rather than the class-based path)
>   2) it would not be a bad idea to start using dot-notation to help
> organise resources in projects
>
> Warmest Regards,
>
> Mark.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>  Mark Waddingham ~ 36degrees at runrev.com ~ http://www.runrev.com
>        Runtime Revolution ~ User-Centric Development Tools
>
> _______________________________________________
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your  
> subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
>