Rev as server immune to buffer overflow?

Pierre Sahores psahores at easynet.fr
Sat Apr 23 04:54:39 EDT 2005


Le 23 avr. 05, à 01:16, Richard Gaskin a écrit :

> Pierre Sahores wrote:
>> Hello Richard,
>> If you avoid the use of "GET" calls to access from a client app to 
>> your rev sockets driven server = if you only use "POST" procs, the 
>> server will never wake up if he recieve a request witch is not listed 
>> in its predefinite collection of actions to handle. It will just stay 
>> in idle state => no way, in using this design guideline to have the 
>> rev app server going to bufferoverflow trouble... Just unpossible. I 
>> never got this in huit yahrs of MC/Rev applications servers deploymen 
>> ;-)
>
> If it's so simple, how does Microsoft keep getting it so wrong year 
> after year?

The less it works ; the most it costs... ;-)
>
> --
>  Richard Gaskin
>  Fourth World Media Corporation
>  __________________________________________________
>  Rev tools and more: http://www.fourthworld.com/rev
> _______________________________________________
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
>




More information about the use-livecode mailing list