Database choosing
Oak Norton
oak at jwscpa.com
Thu Apr 14 14:50:03 EDT 2005
Hello all, I'm a total newbie to Revolution and I have limited programming
experience. I'm one of those people I read about in a recent post that
needs a solution so I figure out how to program it for myself. My
experience has mostly been with cold fusion and MS-SQL/Access. I've been
leaning toward MySQL for a cross-platform project, but from the posts on
this board I'm just about ready to look at PostgreSQL. I know there's some
differences between all the SQL's but don't know much about what they are.
In the example below I see a bit of code which illustrated that point and
just worries me a tad because I find Access invaluable to build queries
quickly and test them out and if I didn't have to change the code at all,
that would be a big plus. So which of the sql flavors is closest to MSSQL
and will go cross-platform?
Thanks,
Oak
> It's been my experience that if you ultimately want to move
> to Oracle,
> Postgresql is a better choice than mySQL because PG tries to be as
> Oracle compatible as possible. I can also tell you from
> experience that
> if you want to move to MS SQL Server later, be VERY careful
> about your
> SQL since there are lots of things that are incompatible even with
> "simple" SQL statements. For example, in Oracle/Postgres you
> would join
> two fields you would use something like SELECT last_name || ', ' ||
> first_name whereas in MS SQL it would be SELECT last_name + ', ' +
> first_name (very VB like).
More information about the use-livecode
mailing list