New Guide to the IDE in Process

[Judy Perry]

Amen.

On Mon, 11 Apr 2005, Dan Shafer wrote:

> The "in principle" argument is simple. The unadorned, unenhanced IDE is
> the common denominator that needs documenting. Third-party tools should
> be documented by their developers, not in a general-usage IDE document.
> There are several completely alternate IDEs running around out there. I
> think the basic need is for documenting what comes with Rev out of the
> box.