New Guide to the IDE in Process

[J. Landman Gay]

On 4/12/05 2:26 AM, Chipp Walters wrote:

> You won't even throw in a plug for altPlugins? I mean, how many times 
> has altArchive saved your skin;-)

Sorry, I have to agree with Dan on this one. Regardless of how useful a 
plugin is, including recommendations for it in a Rev guide is off topic. 
And it would force Dan to choose some plugins over others, which would 
necessarily be arbitrary -- there are so many good ones out there. How 
would he choose which ones to exclude? Best to keep any documentation 
restricted to the IDE itself.

> 
> cw
> 
> Dan Shafer wrote:
> 
>> The "in principle" argument is simple. The unadorned, unenhanced IDE 
>> is the common denominator that needs documenting. Third-party tools 
>> should be documented by their developers, not in a general-usage IDE 
>> document. There are several completely alternate IDEs running around 
>> out there. I think the basic need is for documenting what comes with 
>> Rev out of the box.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
> 
> 
> 


-- 
Jacqueline Landman Gay         |     jacque at hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software           |     http://www.hyperactivesw.com