Why 10 hours for a newbie and 30 days for a "programmer" ?

Dan Shafer revdan at danshafer.com
Wed Sep 1 15:05:22 EDT 2004


With all due respect, I don't think ANY of us is in a position to make 
that judgment without taking the time to look at the experience itself. 
My first cut is that 10 hours just to figure out if it's a tool worth 
investing $100 in is plenty but I don't have any more sound basis for 
that judgment than you do for yours.


On Sep 1, 2004, at 11:23 AM, Marian Petrides wrote:

> That may well be true but the number of hours needs to be closer to 30 
> or 40 to give a reasonable amount of time to learn your way around and 
> then kick the tires a bit.
> On Sep 1, 2004, at 2:21 PM, Dan Shafer wrote:
>> The decision to limit by hours of use rather than be elapsed calendar 
>> days is brilliant. The number may or may not need adjustment, but the 
>> principle is right.
> _______________________________________________
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

More information about the use-livecode mailing list