Why 10 hours for a newbie and 30 days for a "programmer" ?
revdan at danshafer.com
Wed Sep 1 14:05:22 CDT 2004
With all due respect, I don't think ANY of us is in a position to make
that judgment without taking the time to look at the experience itself.
My first cut is that 10 hours just to figure out if it's a tool worth
investing $100 in is plenty but I don't have any more sound basis for
that judgment than you do for yours.
On Sep 1, 2004, at 11:23 AM, Marian Petrides wrote:
> That may well be true but the number of hours needs to be closer to 30
> or 40 to give a reasonable amount of time to learn your way around and
> then kick the tires a bit.
> On Sep 1, 2004, at 2:21 PM, Dan Shafer wrote:
>> The decision to limit by hours of use rather than be elapsed calendar
>> days is brilliant. The number may or may not need adjustment, but the
>> principle is right.
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
More information about the use-livecode