Very strange question?

Fri Oct 29 16:16:51 EDT 2004

I guess my question has mutated.  Is is possible with a front script to catch all "errors" process them (if one dems them of the approiate type) and have the calling script continue processing where it left off with a ret value?

-==-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-
Disclaimer:

Any resemblance between the above views and those of my
employer, my terminal, or the view out my window are purely
coincidental. 
Any resemblance between the above and my own views is non-deterministic.

 The question of the existence of views in the absence of anyone to hold
them
is left as an exercise for the reader. The question of the existence of
the reader
 is left as an exercise for the second god coefficient. 
(A discussion of non-orthogonal, non-integral polytheism is beyond the
scope of this article.)

 --- On Fri 10/29, K < nnoydb at excite.com > wrote:
From: K [mailto: nnoydb at excite.com]
To: use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 16:09:56 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: Very strange question?

I believe the answer to my previous question is NO the error will occure and you will get a error dialog. K -==-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=- Disclaimer: Any resemblance between the above views and those of my employer, my terminal, or the view out my window are purely coincidental. Any resemblance between the above and my own views is non-deterministic. The question of the existence of views in the absence of anyone to hold them is left as an exercise for the reader. The question of the existence of the reader is left as an exercise for the second god coefficient. (A discussion of non-orthogonal, non-integral polytheism is beyond the scope of this article.) --- On Fri 10/29, K < nnoydb at excite.com > wrote: From: K [mailto: nnoydb at excite.com] To: use-revolution at lists.runrev.com Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 15:55:24 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: Very strange question? If a command is execute and messageNotHandled handles the message will RR still throw an error? Example: on mouseUp undefinedHandler "parameter" get undefinedFunction( "parameter" ) end mouseUp In the case the to calls called undefinedXXX do not exist? So if these are passed through messageNotHandled are the considerd handled and do not cause a error? -==-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=- Disclaimer: Any resemblance between the above views and those of my employer, my terminal, or the view out my window are purely coincidental. Any resemblance between the above and my own views is non-deterministic. The question of the existence of views in the absence of anyone to hold them is left as an exercise for the reader. The question of the existence of the reader is left as an exercise for the second god coefficient. (A discussion of non-orthogonal, non-integral polytheis m is beyond the scope of this article.) --- On Fri 10/29, K < nnoydb at excite.com > wrote: From: K [mailto: nnoydb at excite.com] To: use-revolution at lists.runrev.com Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 15:44:53 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: Very strange question? I found that message myself but was not very successful with it (didn't spend much time on it). I will make a attempt to explore it further. Thanks for the suggestion. -==-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=- Disclaimer: Any resemblance between the above views and those of my employer, my terminal, or the view out my window are purely coincidental. Any resemblance between the above and my own views is non-deterministic. The question of the existence of views in the absence of anyone to hold them is left as an exercise for the reader. The question of the existence of the reader is left as an exercise for the second god coefficient. (A discussion of non-orthogonal, non-integral polytheism is beyond the scope of this article.) --- On Fri 10/29, Richard Gaskin < ambassador at fourthworld.com > wrote: From: Richard Gaskin [mailto: ambassador at fourthworld.com] To: use-revolution at lists.ru nrev.com Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 12:40:19 -0700 Subject: Re: Very strange question? K wrote: > Is is possible to create a script handlers/functions that will catch all un-caught messages? If so how would this work? When the messageMessages global property is set to true, a script can catch two new messages, which are fired for each message sent: messageHandled messageNotHandled These are not documented, so officially they may be subject to change. But I learned about them by poking around in Rev's unlocked scripts, so if Rev uses 'em their longevity potential seems reasonable. -- Richard Gaskin Fourth World Media Corporation<br > ___________________________________________________________ Ambassador at FourthWorld.com http://www.FourthWorld.com _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution at lists.runrev.com http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listi nfo/use-revolution _______________________________________________ Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com The most personalized portal on the Web! _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution at lists.runrev.com http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution _______________________________________________ Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com The most personalized portal on the Web! _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution at lists.runrev.com http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution _______________________________________________ Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com The most personalized portal on the Web! _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution at lists.runrev.com http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

_______________________________________________
Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
The most personalized portal on the Web!