Very strange question?

K nnoydb at excite.com
Fri Oct 29 15:55:24 EDT 2004



If a command is execute and messageNotHandled handles the message will RR still throw an error? 

Example:

on mouseUp
  undefinedHandler "parameter"
  get undefinedFunction( "parameter" ) 
end mouseUp

In the case the to calls called undefinedXXX do not exist?  So if these are passed through messageNotHandled are the considerd handled and do not cause a error? 



-==-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-
Disclaimer:

Any resemblance between the above views and those of my
employer, my terminal, or the view out my window are purely
coincidental. 
Any resemblance between the above and my own views is non-deterministic.

 The question of the existence of views in the absence of anyone to hold
them
is left as an exercise for the reader. The question of the existence of
the reader
 is left as an exercise for the second god coefficient. 
(A discussion of non-orthogonal, non-integral polytheism is beyond the
scope of this article.)



 --- On Fri 10/29, K < nnoydb at excite.com > wrote:
From: K [mailto: nnoydb at excite.com]
To: use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 15:44:53 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: Very strange question?

<br><br>I found that message myself but was not very successful with it (didn't spend much time on it). I will make a attempt to explore it further.<br><br>Thanks for the suggestion.<br><br><br>-==-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-<br>Disclaimer:<br><br>Any resemblance between the above views and those of my<br>employer, my terminal, or the view out my window are purely<br>coincidental. <br>Any resemblance between the above and my own views is non-deterministic.<br><br> The question of the existence of views in the absence of anyone to hold<br>them<br>is left as an exercise for the reader. The question of the existence of<br>the reader<br> is left as an exercise for the second god coefficient. <br>(A discussion of non-orthogonal, non-integral polytheism is beyond the<br>scope of this article.)<br><br><br><br> --- On Fri 10/29, Richard Gaskin < ambassador at fourthworld.com > wrote:<br>From: Richard Gaskin [mailto: ambassador at fourthworld.com]<br>To: use-revolution at lists.runrev.com<br>Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 12:40:19 -0700<br>Subject: Re: Very strange question?<br><br>K wrote:<br>> Is is possible to create a script handlers/functions that will catch all un-caught messages? If so how would this work?<br><br>When the messageMessages global property is set to true, a script can <br>catch two new messages, which are fired for each message sent:<br><br>messageHandled<br>messageNotHandled<br><br>These are not documented, so officially they may be subject to change. <br>But I learned about them by poking around in Rev's unlocked scripts, so <br>if Rev uses 'em their longevity potential seems reasonable.<br><br>-- <br>  Richard Gaskin<br>  Fourth World Media Corporation<br>  ___________________________________________________________<br>  Ambassador at FourthWorld.com       http://www.FourthWorld.com<br>_______________________________________________<br>use-revolution mailing list<br>use-revolution at lists.runrev.com<br>http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution<br><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com<br>The most personalized portal on the Web!<br>_______________________________________________<br>use-revolution mailing list<br>use-revolution at lists.runrev.com<br>http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution<br>

_______________________________________________
Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
The most personalized portal on the Web!


More information about the use-livecode mailing list