changing defaultStack

[Richard Gaskin]

Troy Rollins wrote:
> 
> On Nov 29, 2004, at 2:53 AM, Paul Kocsis wrote:
> 
>> By that do you mean that you set the defaultStack at the top of every
>> handler?  Were you having the problem of referring to an object like:
>>
>> field AA   instead of...
>>
>> field AA of stack XX
>>
>> where the former would at times error out with "Object: No such object"??
> 
> 
> Like Richard, I've never actually seen this behave like a "bug"... more 
> like a very slippery reference which can change "behind your back."

Here's a Transcript riddle:  I know of one circumstance in which "the 
defaultStack" will return empty -- what is it?

Though it sounds like a koan there's a real answer, and the logic makes 
a certain sense even if it seems initially counter-intuitive that 
defaultStack should ever be empty....

-- 
  Richard Gaskin
  Fourth World Media Corporation
  ___________________________________________________________
  Ambassador at FourthWorld.com       http://www.FourthWorld.com