nnoydb at excite.com
Wed May 12 07:04:48 CDT 2004
Thanks! That was very helpful and solved a usability issue.
Any resemblance between the above views and those of my
employer, my terminal, or the view out my window are purely
Any resemblance between the above and my own views is non-deterministic.
The question of the existence of views in the absence of anyone to hold
is left as an exercise for the reader. The question of the existence of
is left as an exercise for the second god coefficient.
(A discussion of non-orthogonal, non-integral polytheism is beyond the
scope of this article.)
--- On Wed 05/12, wrote:
From: [mailto: FlexibleLearning at aol.com]
To: use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 07:21:10 EDT
Subject: Re: Confused? "visable" and "go"
>Okay, I just realized somthing I do not understand. I have a sub-stack>called Logger it is loaded (or at least shown in the Application Browser).> When I "get" it's visible property it is true. Now this stack has no>desktop presentation so I assumed (incorrectly as I now know) that this>property would be false (since it is not shown). How else would one find>out if a particular stack is shown (has a desktop presentation)? >>>>K'Closed' and 'visible' are, as you have discovered, not mutually exclusive. Use the mode property to determine if a stack is closed...if the mode of stack "Logger" = 0 then/H_______________________________________________use-revolution mailing listuse-revolution at lists.runrev.comhttp://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
The most personalized portal on the Web!
More information about the use-livecode