#

Kevin nnoydb at excite.com
Tue May 11 15:46:32 EDT 2004



I will give it a try.

-==-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-
Disclaimer:

Any resemblance between the above views and those of my
employer, my terminal, or the view out my window are purely
coincidental. 
Any resemblance between the above and my own views is non-deterministic.

 The question of the existence of views in the absence of anyone to hold
them
is left as an exercise for the reader. The question of the existence of
the reader
 is left as an exercise for the second god coefficient. 
(A discussion of non-orthogonal, non-integral polytheism is beyond the
scope of this article.)



 --- On Tue 05/11, Malte Brill < malte.brill at t-online.de > wrote:
From: Malte Brill [mailto: malte.brill at t-online.de]
To: use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 13:45:39 +0200
Subject: Re: # "go" without focus 

Hi Kevin,<br><br>>However, I do not want it to steal focus.<br><br>try something like this<br><br>put the focusedObject into theObject<br>go stack "yourOtherStack"<br>do "focus on" && theObject<br><br>Best, <br><br>Malte<br><br>_______________________________________________<br>use-revolution mailing list<br>use-revolution at lists.runrev.com<br>http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution<br>

_______________________________________________
Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
The most personalized portal on the Web!


More information about the use-livecode mailing list