disable enable

[hershbp at verizon.net]

Thanks,  good idea , I don't need stack level, card level will do it. 
Is possible to group groups for the second approach?
On Friday, June 18, 2004, at 12:57 AM, Troy Rollins wrote:

>
> On Jun 18, 2004, at 12:33 AM, Howard Bornstein wrote:
>
>>
>>> Hi , is there a way to disable a whole stack or all objects of a 
>>> stack and enable them after that ?
>>
>> I don't know off-hand if every object has a disabled state but you 
>> could try something like this:
>
> I do basically what Howard suggested in my project, though it is at 
> the card level. Well, actually I do the second half (enabling) as a 
> development aid... it allows me access to all of my controls, even 
> though a user wouldn't normally be able to use them at that point in 
> the program. Very useful.
>
> Another useful technique is through grouping, since setting the 
> enabled of a group to false, sets all of its contained controls to 
> false, or setting to true, sets them all to true. The cool part of 
> that technique is that it doesn't require a repeat loop, and acts very 
> quickly.
>
> Either way, it certainly works at the card level, for the current 
> card. I don't know about doing this at the stack level for controls 
> which are not currently displayed.
>
> --
> Troy
> RPSystems, Ltd.
> http://www.rpsystems.net
>
> _______________________________________________
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
>