Rev 2.2 and Mac OS 10.1

[James.Cass at sealedair.com]

> I knew that 10.0.0.4 was beta, but I thought that 10.1 was the release
> that was official - - - is this not the case?

I meant that somewhat tongue-in-cheek when I said 10.1 was beta.  10.1 was
an "official release" by Apple, but most users agree it was far from a
finished product.  I can't point you to a specific website, but just from
my experience in using Mac OS X since the public beta (now running Panther
10.3.4), I would not let 10.1.5 be the foundation of my ISP business if I
had one.  Mac OS X Tiger (10.4) will already make it's debut at the World
Wide Developer's Conference June 28-July 2.  An ISP should be looking at
OSX server anyway.

That's my 4 kopeks.
- James




|---------+--------------------------------------->
|         |           RGould8 at aol.com             |
|         |           Sent by:                    |
|         |           use-revolution-bounces at lists|
|         |           .runrev.com                 |
|         |                                       |
|         |                                       |
|         |           06/14/04 02:25 PM           |
|         |           Please respond to How to use|
|         |           Revolution                  |
|         |                                       |
|---------+--------------------------------------->
  >----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |                                                                                                    |
  |       To:       use-revolution at lists.runrev.com                                                    |
  |       cc:                                                                                          |
  |       Subject:  Re: Rev 2.2 and Mac OS 10.1                                                        |
  >----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|




Well, I believe you - - - now I just need to somehow convince my client
that no one in their right mind would still be on 10.1.   This is an ISP,
so
they want to reach as many people as possible.   Is there an URL
anywhere with stats that says, "Hey, no one is even using 10.1"?
I knew that 10.0.0.4 was beta, but I thought that 10.1 was the release
that was official - - - is this not the case?


In a message dated 6/14/04 2:08:31 PM, James.Cass at sealedair.com writes:


> I would not recommend anyone to still be in Mac OS 10.1.x.
> This was basically nothing more than the beta release for Mac OS X.
> Mac OS 10.1.x had lots of issues all on its own.  At least use Jaguar
> (10.2.8).
> That's my 2 kopeks.
>
> -James
>
>
>
>
>
>
> RGould8 at aol.com
> Sent by: use-revolution-bounces at lists.runrev.com
> 06/14/04 12:47 PM
> Please respond to How to use Revolution
>
>         To:     use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
>         cc:
>         Subject:        Rev 2.2 and Mac OS 10.1
>
>
> Is there anything unusual about how Revolution 2.2 apps are built that
> would
> cause a standalone app to not launch in Mac OS 10.1, but launch in
10.1.5?
> I'm not familiar with the differences between those 2 OS's, but the guys
> in our
> testing group are saying that for some reason, our Revolution app doesn't
> even start in OS 10.1.   To continue the test, we build a standalone
stack
> with
> just 1 button on it, ran it on OS 1.1, and sure enough, it didn't even
> launch.
> I'm thinking that perhaps the test-lab didn't install OS 10.1 properly,
> but
> perhaps someone on this list knows of other issues.   According to the
> Revolution web-site, standalone apps should work on "Mac OS X (any
> version)".   I'm
> hoping that this is just a test-lab OS install problem and not a Rev
> problem.
> _______________________________________________
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
> _______________________________________________
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
>
>

_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
 http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution