Encryption or SHA - URGENT PLEASE
nnoydb at excite.com
Fri Jun 11 12:57:14 CDT 2004
I would be very interested in you blowfish encryption.
Any resemblance between the above views and those of my
employer, my terminal, or the view out my window are purely
Any resemblance between the above and my own views is non-deterministic.
The question of the existence of views in the absence of anyone to hold
is left as an exercise for the reader. The question of the existence of
is left as an exercise for the second god coefficient.
(A discussion of non-orthogonal, non-integral polytheism is beyond the
scope of this article.)
--- On Fri 06/11, Mark Brownell < gizmotron at earthlink.net > wrote:
From: Mark Brownell [mailto: gizmotron at earthlink.net]
To: geoff at advantae.com, use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 09:43:00 -0700
Subject: Re: Encryption or SHA - URGENT PLEASE
<br>On Friday, June 11, 2004, at 09:23 AM, Geoff Caplan wrote:<br><br>> We URGENTLY need a recognised 2 way encryption algorithm - has anyone<br>> done one please? Don't have time to do it from scratch.<br><br>What do you mean by recognized 2 way encryption algorithm. I mean will <br>you be encrypting with a Rev application but decrypting with a standard <br>version of something like Blowfish within the openSSL libraries? I ask <br>because if you are in the USA I can send to you a transcript based <br>Blowfish_CBC version that I created.<br><br>Let me know,<br><br>Mark<br><br>_______________________________________________<br>use-revolution mailing list<br>use-revolution at lists.runrev.com<br>http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution<br>
Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
The most personalized portal on the Web!
More information about the use-livecode