2.5 cursor change
Jeanne A. E. DeVoto
revolution at jaedworks.com
Sat Jul 31 02:09:33 EDT 2004
At 9:50 PM -0500 7/30/2004, J. Landman Gay wrote:
>Another way to handle it would be to retain the mickey hand during
>development and then allow the user to specify when building a
>standalone whether to keep it or not. It would be very simple
>change; if the hand cursor isn't available, Rev uses the system
>arrow by default. The only thing you have to do to get a standard
>cursor in a standalone is leave out the hand.
Like the idea, but don't like that implementation: developers might
want to use the hand (for instance, to indicate links) but want the
default cursor to be an arrow. If the standalone builder takes out
the hand then it's not available for browser-type applications, where
it's useful.
Possibly use a white-outlined arrow for the pointer tool? (Although I
think Windows uses such a cursor for something else.)
My feeling is that if you have to squint at the cursor to figure out
which mode you're in - if you even have to think about it - there's a
usability problem.
--
jeanne a. e. devoto ~ revolution at jaedworks.com
http://www.jaedworks.com
More information about the use-livecode
mailing list