weird behavior

[Richard Gaskin]

Wouter wrote:
>> I'm not convinced. The description above requires that a polygon must 
>> meet
>> one or other of the two conditions - and many "obvious" polygons will not
>> satisfy either condition. No need to invoke the opacity of the polygon.
>> Your original example had a non-blank last line containing a point which
>> was not a duplicate of the first point - therefore was neither an open 
>> nor a closed polygon.
> 
> This is the difference in looking at things.
> Is it the engine that should be conform to the description or is it the 
> description that should be conform to the engine?

I vote for whichever one gives the developer the greater range of options.

-- 
  Richard Gaskin
  Fourth World Media Corporation
  ___________________________________________________
  Rev tools and more:  http://www.fourthworld.com/rev