Arrays in Rev (long)

Wouter wouter.abraham at pi.be
Tue Jul 13 12:43:45 EDT 2004


On 13 Jul 2004, at 17:09, use-revolution-request at lists.runrev.com wrote:

> Message: 15
> Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 07:08:51 -0700
> From: Jim Hurley <jhurley at infostations.com>
> Subject: Re: Arrays in Rev (long)
> To: use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
> Message-ID: <a05100300bd19976cc299@[66.81.128.123]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
>
>>

snip


>>
>> And here we see that delimited vars don't scale well in indexed 
>> accesses:
>>
>> Props:  165 ms
>> Vars: 17155 ms
>> Array:  110 ms
>>
>
> Richard,
>
> Here is an interesting machine-dependant comparison. For your handler
> above I get, on my PowerBook G4 (866 MHz):
>
> Props: 1270 ms
> Vars: 17285 ms
> Array: 684 ms
>
> It is not surprising that the PowerBook should be slower (depressing
> how much slower) but that the result for the variable test is almost
> the same, while the other two test differ dramatically.
>

Another machine-dependant and environment-dependant comparison on my 
PowerBook G4 (400 MHz):

Metacard:
Props: 457
Vars: 40411
Array: 247

Revolution:
Props: 1043
Vars: 38715
Array: 441


Completely depressed :^)

Greeting,
WA



More information about the use-livecode mailing list