Flatter than I hoped for

[Ken Ray]

Doug,

> This is "ok", but I was hoping to be able to do this more 
> modularly - keeping all of a particular stack's handlers 
> within a substack. But as soon as I needed a depth of more 
> than 2 (a substack of a substack) this became unfeasible.

AFAIK you can't have a substack of a substack, so I don't know what you
mean...

> I think better support for a more flexible stack hierarchy 
> would be useful in future Rev enhancements. Especially for 
> groups of people working together on a single project, or for 
> creating plugin features to an existing app.

How do you think the hierarchy should be changed? Just curious...

Ken Ray
Sons of Thunder Software
Email: kray at sonsothunder.com
Web Site: http://www.sonsothunder.com/