Transcript and/or ECMA - guess who started it?
ops at myesa.com
Wed Feb 18 12:24:09 CST 2004
I'm *really* not following the wisdom of all this...to me, IT'S NOT
BROKE (Transcript language-wise)...if this discussion is based in a
desire for current Rev programmers to have Transcript understand a
syntax that they may be more familiar with, then I think it's insane to
accommodate that desire, as the more Rev/Transcript is used, the more
folks in that category will appreciate and embrace the virtues of
current Transcript. If this discussion is designed to increase the Rev
developer crowd by offering a syntax that is more prolific to the
developer community, then I think that other methods would be much more
wise to employ, such as fixing bugs and improving Rev PR in general...
just .02 from a fairly new Rev developer.
>>>Each statement needs to start with a verb. Rather than break XTalk it would
>>This would be awesome, and would allow all sorts of additional
>>flexibility. Set the script language to "applescript" and write in
>>that. It would open up whole new worlds.
> This is probably a dumb question, but what kind of new world would
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
More information about the use-livecode