RunRev vs RealBasic

[cdunix at praevius.com]

The ability to immediately test an interface is a very, very attractive one. 
Although "getting to the window" in test is usually dependent on other things
as well, it would still be helpful to be able to do.  I do deal with a lot of
desktop applications as well, so data persistence without the need for a DB
backend is also a requirement.  How does RunRev handle this?  Is there a native
DB format?  Are objects capable of serializing themselves or would routines need
to be written?

I really appreciate the LIST's prompt feedback!

Thanks,
Michael

> Personally I think on of the biggest advantages that Rev has over RB 
> is that
> you can go from editing to running *immediately*; you don't need to 
> compile
> and run.

----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.