Standalone Problems for OSX and OS9 apps
Ben Rubinstein
benr_mc at cogapp.com
Wed Dec 8 12:59:08 EST 2004
Richard wrote:
>> According to Tuviah's note on the latest of the above reports, the problem is
>> in the development tool (CodeWarrior) that the Mac engine is built in, so
>> RunRev can't fix it until Metrowerks fix that. Which puts me in somwewhat of
>> a biter bit situation, since there are a number of bugs in my products that I
>> tell my users "I can't do anything about it until my development environment
>> [rev] is fixed". Now I know how they feel!
>
> Why not just build them a native version for OS X? They'll have a more
> consistent experience with the rest of the OS, and it'll perform better
> than running under the Classic layer.
Sorry, I lacked clarity. Two separate things.
- I have users actually running OS 9 for some of my tools. I need to build
them a 'Classic' standalone. The problem is I can't easily test it since my
development machine is MacOS X. I sometimes literally have to reboot into
Classic - and when this machine packs up (can't be much longer now) I won't
even have that option. Currently the weird situation is that I can more
easily test my Windows standalones (using VPC) than I can Classic ones.
- entirely separate, there are issues such as the - now fixed! - inability
to use file extensions in OS X, the consequences of which have been noted
and complained of by my users; to who I've given exactly the response that
Tuviah has had to for #2212.
Ben Rubinstein | Email: benr_mc at cogapp.com
Cognitive Applications Ltd | Phone: +44 (0)1273-821600
http://www.cogapp.com | Fax : +44 (0)1273-728866
More information about the use-livecode
mailing list