Questions about Rev/Transcript vs. other toolkits

[Chipp Walters]

Certainly there are some imaging tasks which can be done better in Flash 
or Director, and some done better in RR. I seriously doubt ButtonGadget 
could be built in either Flash or Director. Among other things, 
ButtonGadget has a transcript-coded compositing engine and convolution 
filter.

In fact, I wouldn't know if you can directly edit the binary data of 
images (bits and bytes, not pixels) in either Flash or Director w/out 
some sort of external.

OTH, Flash has anti-aliased graphics and Director built-in 3D capabilities.

 From a multimedia perspective, Flash and Director pretty much have it 
all over RR. If one is planning on creating a complex multimedia 
product, then I would of course suggest Director. That is not to say you 
can't create multimedia within RR, just that more options are available 
to developers in either Flash or Director.

best,

Chipp

Troy Rollins wrote:


> Really? You consider Rev particularly strong in Imaging and Multimedia too?
> 
> I've been biting my tongue on that one.