ActiveX and RR

[K]

Does your implementation support *nix platforms?   


-==-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-
Disclaimer:

Any resemblance between the above views and those of my
employer, my terminal, or the view out my window are purely
coincidental. 
Any resemblance between the above and my own views is non-deterministic.

 The question of the existence of views in the absence of anyone to hold
them
is left as an exercise for the reader. The question of the existence of
the reader
 is left as an exercise for the second god coefficient. 
(A discussion of non-orthogonal, non-integral polytheism is beyond the
scope of this article.)



 --- On Tue 08/10, Mark Wieder < mwieder at ahsoftware.net > wrote:
From: Mark Wieder [mailto: mwieder at ahsoftware.net]
To: use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 11:44:52 -0700
Subject: Re: ActiveX and RR

K-<br><br>Tuesday, August 10, 2004, 4:41:47 AM, you wrote:<br><br>K> I believe the focus on ActiveX is a bit short sighted once RR<br>K> can make native OS calls (GetProcAddress, LoadLibrary ...) ActiveX,<br><br>I did the LoadLibrary and GetProcAddress external calls some time ago,<br>but without engine support they aren't that useful by themselves.<br><br>-- <br>-Mark Wieder<br> mwieder at ahsoftware.net<br><br>_______________________________________________<br>use-revolution mailing list<br>use-revolution at lists.runrev.com<br>http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution<br>

_______________________________________________
Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
The most personalized portal on the Web!