sound in revolution

Stephen King st.king42 at ntlworld.com
Sat Aug 7 10:28:55 EDT 2004


Klaus wrote..
> But i hade big success playing WAV (which is noit necessarily = WAV
> ;-), AIF, AU
> and MP3 as sounds and "AVI (even DivX) and MPG as video files on Windoze
> without QT being installed (= NO QT ;-)


Klaus, How did you manage WAVs? I am sure I have not managed to play a
windows WAV file in Rev without QT being installed? To me it was a big
problem as WAV is still the 'native' recording type for windows for many
apps and earlier Win versions.

Dar Wrote
> But i also cannot understand why some pcs do not install QT, but wanna
> have FULL
> "multimedia" experience... OK, it is not MS...

I don't think it's some, I don't think any distributors in teh Uk ship with
QT installed.
The main problem as I see it is:
- Many users do not have the rights to install these things. I am an
engineer of 25 years working with many other engineers. We all have home PCs
and know how to use them but none of us can install anything at work. It has
to be done through an IT team. This is the same for most organisations I
believe. I think its pretty unusual now for businesses to give their workers
admin rights - the risk of loading unlicensed software and penalties is just
too high. I would think that assuming all users can download QT and install
is no longer true.
- Windows is shipped with media player, just like Mac OS is shipped with QT.
So most users don't need it.

So as Rev needs it for full potential- why can't Rev bundle QT with the
player at source (or have as an associated install)? I've seen many other
programs that ask me if I want to install QT as well (the QT licensing for
individuals is really a bit cumbersome for the stack producer).

Cheers
Steve



More information about the use-livecode mailing list