Dealing with creeping featurism in customer requests
mpetrides at earthlink.net
Wed Aug 4 10:44:25 EDT 2004
>>>When I was a builder I made the customer pay in advance for all
feature improvements beyond the original contract. That tends to put
the burden of hell back on the customer.
Not a bad idea, Mark.
On Aug 4, 2004, at 10:39 AM, Mark Brownell wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 4, 2004, at 07:08 AM, Andre Garzia wrote:
>> but that's just my theory, I don't know why I typed this, I just
>> awoke, took a bath and checked email... I'll begin to make more sense
>> after tea.
> 6) "This must be Andre's code before tea." <--- :-)
> I like send in time too. I used to be a building contractor so when
> thinking about the original premise of the topic for this thread I
> thought that send in time might be improved by adding by adding a
> secondary option with "all the new features." When I was a builder I
> made the customer pay in advance for all feature improvements beyond
> the original contract. That tends to put the burden of hell back on
> the customer.
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
More information about the Use-livecode