XML to XHTML via XSLT
Mark Brownell
gizmotron at earthlink.net
Sat Apr 17 02:32:15 EDT 2004
On Friday, April 16, 2004, at 09:25 PM, Sannyasin Sivakatirswami wrote:
> But I'm bit naive I think in terms of expectations for using XML docs
> as source for web delivery. I thought it was something simple. I'm
> just now starting to look into the options, but client side XSL
> transformations of XML source to dependable XHTML seems to be a can of
> worms.
I love this. Not to put words in your mouth but this is a reoccurring
theme among most XML implementers. XML was supposed to make many things
easier, better for their company and its bottom line, and a lot of
other great things that make many companies more productive in many
ways. The truth is it hasn't done this even though many companies are
still paying someone to chase their tails in this new direction.
What has worked is teaching content providers to use XML based
validated templates running as customized editors that check for proper
well formed validation & style. This is done so that static web pages
can be written by non-tech-types that can be transformed into their
company's HTML pages and that include CGI & server side database
information. So the content person writes in an editor that outputs XML
data based on its DTD validation. The company uses this validated
format system to update their website faster and with less technical
advice from the tech side. In a way it gives tech-power to the creative
side of website providers team.
<my value="2 cents"/>
Mark Brownell
More information about the use-livecode
mailing list