wait for 1.2 seconds with messages -- twice hangs
Dar Scott
dsc at swcp.com
Tue Apr 6 15:35:29 EDT 2004
On Friday, April 2, 2004, at 08:15 PM, Steven Zins wrote:
> Speculation: "wait for N seconds with messages" allows other handlers
> to respond to messages but does not allow a handler to resume after a
> wait.
Many of us have had to do the same test when we first tried to do
several things at once with Revolution.
This is not a multi-"threading" situation in which execution can switch
back and forth between handlers. Your test2 is started in the wait in
test1 but does not return and thus test1 cannot continue; its wait does
not complete.
I rarely use wait with messages and then only for a single big task I
have trouble breaking up with 'send'.
In most cases, I use 'send'. See my Message Mechanics Primer at my web
site on using that for "multi-tasking" types of situations. You can
make your apps walk and chew gum at the same time.
Dar Scott
--
****************************************
Dar Scott Consulting
http://www.swcp.com/dsc/
Programming Services
****************************************
More information about the use-livecode
mailing list