Rev Player
Revinfo1155 at aol.com
Revinfo1155 at aol.com
Tue Sep 23 14:41:01 EDT 2003
In a message dated 9/23/03 4:58:05 PM, preid at reidit.co.uk writes:
> >I have one for my own needs, but I think a player for general use should
> >come from the mother ship to maximize standardization and distribution.
> >
> >Just curious: What would you like to do with a player than couldn't be
> done
> >as a standalone?
> >
> >Richard Gaskin
>
> I have produced a small number of CBTs for a UK government
> organisation who need to validate all executables for security
> reasons. Supplying a single player with add-on stacks makes life
> easier in this respect. It is easier to persuade public sector
> customers that they are only running a single program with
> downloadable modules than it is to say they need to allow an
> increasing number of new executables. They get twitchy about the
> security implications of new EXE files!
>
> Also, it minimises network traffic if each client workstation has a
> single player installed which is set up as the helper-app within the
> browser so the user can download any of a number of CBT stacks
> without having to download the player engine each time or have to
> decide what to do with an executable (with attendant "security
> warnings" from their browser!).
>
> Cheers
>
> Peter
>
Peter-have you got a sample player we could look at?
Jack
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.runrev.com/pipermail/use-livecode/attachments/20030923/8cf0928d/attachment-0023.htm>
More information about the use-livecode
mailing list