[OT] browser plugin patents - warning!
Alex Rice
alex at mindlube.com
Fri Sep 12 15:19:01 EDT 2003
On Friday, September 12, 2003, at 05:14 PM, Jim Lambert wrote:
> <What is REALLY irritating is that prior art on this is SOOOO bloody
> obvious.>
>
> And yet MS's legion of attorneys could not prevail.
> Wonder if they wanted to lose?
People are assuming that Microsoft couldn't show prior art. But
remember there was no TCP/IP stack builtin to Windows until 1995. In
'93 Microsoft was just discovering the Internet - in a sense.
But what about AOL, Compuserve, various BBS systems? I'm guessing
that's why Eolas went after Microsoft instead of AOL.
I hate software patents. Software companies should be forced to compete
on quality of product and speed to market, not on "I had this idea
before you nya-nya-nya-nya-nya"
Alex Rice <alex at mindlube.com> | Mindlube Software | http://mindlube.com
what a waste of thumbs that are opposable
to make machines that are disposable -Ani DiFranco
More information about the use-livecode
mailing list