JDBC instead of ODBC

Júlio César Ködel kodel at terra.com.br
Fri Oct 3 16:08:01 CDT 2003


Those links that I passed in my messages are both for open source ODBC
engines (for both Windows and Linux). I think would not be hard to make a
MacOS X version, but, for MacOS, I don't know (therefore, I hate macs ;-] )

----- Original Message -----
From: "Alex Rice" <alex at mindlube.com>
To: <use-revolution at lists.runrev.com>
Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 5:31 PM
Subject: Re: JDBC instead of ODBC


>
> On Friday, October 3, 2003, at 01:01  PM, Todd Geist wrote:
> >  Is it particular hard to build this kind of driver?
>
> If you are programming in Java it's not hard, I would imagine.
> But JDBC makes no sense for Rev because it's not related to Java in any
> way.
>
>
> Alex Rice <alex at mindlube.com> | Mindlube Software | http://mindlube.com
>
> what a waste of thumbs that are opposable
> to make machines that are disposable  -Ani DiFranco
>
> _______________________________________________
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
>
> Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo E-mail Protegido Terra.
> Scan engine: VirusScan / Atualizado em 01/10/2003 / Versão: 1.4.0
> Proteja o seu e-mail Terra: http://www.emailprotegido.terra.com.br/
>




More information about the use-livecode mailing list